+1. One place where we could "spend our energy wiser" might be on enabling interoperability of HTTP transported realtime media. Although peer-to-peer traffic is more desirable when possible, "HTTP fallback" is in practice required a significant fraction of the time, due to the prevalence of highly restrictive firewalls.
From: stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com To: tom.taylo@huawei.com; harald@alvestrand.no; Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 15:17:51 +0100 CC: rtc-web@alvestrand.no; dispatch@ietf.org Subject: Re: [RTW] [dispatch] Charter proposal: The activity hitherto known as "RTC-WEB at IETF"
I agree that at least for the time being it is more fruitful to focus the energy elsewhere. There is plenty of useful work that can be done about media transport (the datagram service and the potential bytestream ) and the associated APIs, and I suggest we focus on that. We can try our luck with the codec thing later on.
I agree. Codec discussions seem to go on forever, and we could spend our energy wiser.
Stefan
PS Sorry for answering late, but I did not follow dispatch. I thought all related messages would go on rtc-web as well. So those of you who do not follow dispatch: perhaps you should look into the dispatch archive. _______________________________________________ RTC-Web mailing list RTC-Web@alvestrand.no http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtc-web