+1.

One place where we could "spend our energy wiser" might be on enabling interoperability
of HTTP transported realtime media.   Although peer-to-peer traffic is more desirable when
possible, "HTTP fallback" is in practice required a significant fraction of the time, due to the
prevalence of highly restrictive firewalls.

> From: stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com
> To: tom.taylo@huawei.com; harald@alvestrand.no; Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com
> Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 15:17:51 +0100
> CC: rtc-web@alvestrand.no; dispatch@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [RTW] [dispatch] Charter proposal: The activity hitherto known as "RTC-WEB at IETF"
> >
> >I agree that at least for the time being it is more fruitful to focus
> >the energy elsewhere. There is plenty of useful work that can be done
> >about media transport (the datagram service and the potential bytestream
> >) and the associated APIs, and I suggest we focus on that. We can try our
> >luck with the codec thing later on.
>
> I agree. Codec discussions seem to go on forever, and we could spend our
> energy wiser.
>
> Stefan
>
> PS Sorry for answering late, but I did not follow dispatch. I thought all
> related messages would go on rtc-web as well. So those of you who do not
> follow dispatch: perhaps you should look into the dispatch archive.
> _______________________________________________
> RTC-Web mailing list
> RTC-Web@alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtc-web