On 29 Mar 2012, at 13:38, Stefan Holmer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> wrote:
On 29 Mar 2012, at 13:19, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> On 03/29/2012 01:07 PM, Ali C. Begen (abegen) wrote:
>> I suppose these were random losses?
> This is just putting numbers into the TCP throughput algorithm from the TCP-Friendly RFC using its parameter p, and trying to see what the implications of the result are.
>
> I presume that p was assumed to be random in the derivation of the formula.

It's a loss event rate. The equation gives a conservative value for the throughput if the loss is bursty.

Which is likely for queues employing tail dropping.

Agree, but (at least from the measurements I've seen) the estimate won't be too bad.




-- 
Colin Perkins