On 7/8/2012 11:13 PM, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) wrote:
John Leslie <john@jlc.net> wrote:
RTP-congestion work is NOT limited to RTCWEB. Please recall our BoF is called "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques".
Trying to avoid specifics to talk to the general issues:
Is there consensus on this first critical point?
1. Some folks are using RTP and RTCWEB interchangeably.
They shouldn't. We need solutions for both, but as a (largely) green-field rtcweb may be able to implement things sooner (or with more ubiquity) than general RTP applications.
2. Some folks are assuming the work is limited to new protocols only (like maybe RTCWEB and CLUE), as evidenced by proposals to consider SCTP.
I would not assume that, but it may be easier to deploy in those environments per above, or they may add constraints that help solutions for those areas.
3. Some folks are assuming all RTP applications are in scope. 4. Some folks are assuming interoperability with existing RTP applications are also in scope.
yes - but gaining benefits for existing apps without any change by them is unlikely except via network changes. With changes, existing apps may be able to more fully take part.
I disagree with 1+2. Does anyone disagree with 3+4?
-- Randell Jesup randell-ietf@jesup.org