Now that we've had a few days to think about this, I'm suggesting that we can send off this agenda proposal to the ICCRG chairs and/or the ICCRG mailing list. Does that sound good?

If the circuit-breakers draft is coming today, we should wait until we have the real name of that, of course.

On 03/01/2012 02:16 PM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:

Hi folks,

I put together a short agenda for our 1-hour slot in Paris here:

https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1vGWk3pu_w7NmSPHbcxZoUEgVb-4RquIkVF-iZ6787uM/edit

IETF 83 - RTP Congestion Control agenda

Date, time: ICCRG meeting, one hour out of Tuesday 1520-1810 (likely 1710-1810)
Topic chair: Harald Alvestrand

Introducttion: The RTCWEB effort, and the traffic we expect to generate - Harald (10 min)
- Doc: draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-02
- Doc: draft-jesup-rtp-congestion-reqs-00
Nice behaviour for RTP-based services - Varun Singh, Colin Perkins (10 min)
- Doc: draft-??-circuit-breakers-00
A delay based congestion control candidate - Stefan Holmer (15 min)
- Doc: draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-congetstion-01
Feedback mechanisms that might be useful - Harald Alvestrand (5 min)
- Doc: draft-alvestrand-rmcat-remb-00
A possible WG charter: RMCAT (15 min)
- Doc: http://www.ietf.org/iesg/evaluation/rmcat-charter.txt
Summary, conclusions, next steps (5 min)