Dear Colin, we also worked on issues related to Saurin's thesis which can be found in a IEEE ICNP publication: L. De Cicco, S. Mascolo A Mismatch Controller for Implementing High-Speed Rate-based Transport Protocols in Proc of 17th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP '09), Princeton, NJ, USA , Oct. 13-16, 2009 http://c3lab.poliba.it/images/d/d9/Icnp09.pdf Cheers, Luca On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> wrote:
On 17 Apr 2012, at 08:16, Michael Welzl wrote:
I noticed that TFRC is, well, unpopular here. I understand the reasons, in particular the group's desire to minimize buffering. So I'm not making a proposal here, just asking a question out of academic curiosity: is this just handwaving and assumptions, or have some people given it a try and found that it doesn't work well? Are there any documented results showing that?
I had a Masters student look at it a few years ago, who had some problems making TFRC usable in practice: http://csperkins.org/research/thesis-msc-saurin.pdf
Also, the TFWC work http://tfwc.hackerslab.eu/ points to various problems with TFRC.
Colin
I think someone posted earlier on that there were poor experiences with TFRC; I'm just interested in more details about that. Again, I'm not proposing anything here, just interested for my own research.
Cheers, Michael
_______________________________________________ Rtp-congestion mailing list Rtp-congestion@alvestrand.no http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtp-congestion
-- Colin Perkins http://csperkins.org/
_______________________________________________ Rtp-congestion mailing list Rtp-congestion@alvestrand.no http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtp-congestion