On 17 Apr 2012, at 08:16, Michael Welzl wrote:
I noticed that TFRC is, well, unpopular here. I understand the reasons, in particular the group's desire to minimize buffering. So I'm not making a proposal here, just asking a question out of academic curiosity: is this just handwaving and assumptions, or have some people given it a try and found that it doesn't work well? Are there any documented results showing that?
I had a Masters student look at it a few years ago, who had some problems making TFRC usable in practice: http://csperkins.org/research/thesis-msc-saurin.pdf Also, the TFWC work http://tfwc.hackerslab.eu/ points to various problems with TFRC. Colin
I think someone posted earlier on that there were poor experiences with TFRC; I'm just interested in more details about that. Again, I'm not proposing anything here, just interested for my own research.
Cheers, Michael
_______________________________________________ Rtp-congestion mailing list Rtp-congestion@alvestrand.no http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtp-congestion
-- Colin Perkins http://csperkins.org/