Harald, I think "RTCWEB" works perfectly fine and, like you said, has already been what this group has been referred to in other conversations. My 2 cents, Dan On Feb 17, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:

It seems that most people have been comfortable with referring to this effort as RTCWEB. That's also the name we got our BOF approved under.

Our current charter draft at http://rtc-web.alvestrand.com/ietf-activity has a kitchen-sink list of possible names; we could in theory hold a straw poll on the list, ask everyone to rank their preferred opinion, do a Condorcet-method ranking exercise on the result, and hope that we don't end up with a preference loop... but it might be simpler to just declare consensus and leave it as-is.

If Ted, Cullen and I don't hear a groundswell of opinion that we need to run a straw poll exercise, we'll just leave it as RTCWEB, and remove the alternatives.

Seems OK?

Harald

_______________________________________________ RTC-Web mailing list RTC-Web@alvestrand.no http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtc-web

-- Dan York, Director of Conversations Voxeo Corporation http://www.voxeo.com dyork@voxeo.com Phone: +1-407-455-5859 Skype: danyork Join the Voxeo conversation: Blogs: http://blogs.voxeo.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/voxeo http://twitter.com/danyork Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/voxeo

RTCWEB is fine. Regards, Christer ________________________________________ From: rtc-web-bounces@alvestrand.no [rtc-web-bounces@alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Harald Alvestrand [harald@alvestrand.no] Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 4:18 PM To: rtc-web@alvestrand.no Subject: [RTW] Name of group: RTCWEB or voting? It seems that most people have been comfortable with referring to this effort as RTCWEB. That's also the name we got our BOF approved under. Our current charter draft at http://rtc-web.alvestrand.com/ietf-activity has a kitchen-sink list of possible names; we could in theory hold a straw poll on the list, ask everyone to rank their preferred opinion, do a Condorcet-method ranking exercise on the result, and hope that we don't end up with a preference loop... but it might be simpler to just declare consensus and leave it as-is. If Ted, Cullen and I don't hear a groundswell of opinion that we need to run a straw poll exercise, we'll just leave it as RTCWEB, and remove the alternatives. Seems OK? Harald _______________________________________________ RTC-Web mailing list RTC-Web@alvestrand.no http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtc-web

+1 Oddly, when I first saw that name it reminded me of the old RTC Client API reference via Microsoft, but I am feeling much better now ;) -Erik On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>wrote:

It seems that most people have been comfortable with referring to this effort as RTCWEB. That's also the name we got our BOF approved under.

Our current charter draft at http://rtc-web.alvestrand.com/ietf-activityhas a kitchen-sink list of possible names; we could in theory hold a straw poll on the list, ask everyone to rank their preferred opinion, do a Condorcet-method ranking exercise on the result, and hope that we don't end up with a preference loop... but it might be simpler to just declare consensus and leave it as-is.

If Ted, Cullen and I don't hear a groundswell of opinion that we need to run a straw poll exercise, we'll just leave it as RTCWEB, and remove the alternatives.

Seems OK?

Harald

_______________________________________________ RTC-Web mailing list RTC-Web@alvestrand.no http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtc-web