On 01/14/11 10:15, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:55:03 +0100, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
Enclosed is the (HTML format) current proposal for a W3C activity. Discussion of this is not a DISPATCH activity, so should go to the rtc-web list until further notice.
Harald
I would suggest that teleconferences be limited to a minimum, following <http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter>, which says:
Teleconferences: up to 1 per week, as needed
My expectation would be that no teleconferences are ever needed, as it is a terrible medium for discussing technical issues. In particular, no WG decisions should ever be taken in a teleconference, as that would force everyone to call in at the right time and listen to an hour of hissing/bubbling sounds just to have their vote count.
I have found that teleconferences can be extremely useful as "timeline punctuation". I disagree with the idea that everyone who watches/reviews a proposal needs to be on every teleconference every time, but it can be useful as a method to sync chairs, editors and other people who have taken on responsibilities - they're good for effort management, but as you say, bad for technical discussions except (possibly) at critical junctures. The W3C people have said that this can be adjusted dynamically by the WG chairs. Harald