2 Dec
2010
2 Dec
'10
6:20 p.m.
On Dec 2, 2010, at 19:15 , David Singer wrote:
we probably want an interest group at the w3c, while we work out what needs to happen. I would hope that most of the work would be in existing WGs. There is a lower bar to setting up an IG.
If the deliverables are clear and sufficiently agreed upon, I would think that going straight to a WG would be better than waiting in an IG beforehand. I generally like the idea of doing new work in existing WGs where possible, it's less overhead (though I wouldn't make that a strong rule). Do you have a specific group in mind that you would see this fit well into? -- Robin Berjon robineko — hired gun, higher standards http://robineko.com/