Ah SIP! Seriously, you need more words to indicate the restriction of such a development to the particular use case for the working group. Regards Keith -----Original Message----- From: dispatch-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dispatch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adam Roach Sent: 27 January 2011 15:19 To: Cullen Jennings Cc: rtc-web@alvestrand.no; DISPATCH list; Xavier Marjou Subject: Re: [dispatch] [RTW] The charter formerly know as RTC-WEB take 3 On 1/26/11 8:04 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
Perhaps the charter should explicitly say this but that is why it seems so mute on this topic, it is.
I would imagine something along these lines would put the topic to rest: "The selection, design and/or extension of a protocol or protocols for establishing and controlling media sessions is in scope for the working group." I think it's a lot better than remaining silent on the topic, since it leaves several avenues open to the working group. We really don't want to get part of the way down this path with people under the misimpression that we *must* design a new protocol, or that we *must* select an existing protocol. I think we should do whichever of these makes the most sense after a careful analysis, and that such analysis is best performed by the working group (not in DISPATCH). /a _______________________________________________ dispatch mailing list dispatch@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch