On 01/07/11 10:56, Elwell, John wrote:
I also agree that codecs such as H.264 AVC need to be considered, because of interworking with non-RTC-web users, conference bridges, etc.. An important part of the proposed charter is: "* interoperate with compatible voice and video systems that are not web based" This can turn out to be seriously problematic if we don't constrain it carefully - when we wrote this, my thinking was that it meant "if devices send and receive media in formats that we support, and the setup is performed in a reasonable way through intermediaries, we should be able to send media directly to them".
I see the use case that we *have* to support as the browser-to-browser use case. If we are able to support other use cases too, that is a good thing, but very much a lower priority to me. Opinions may differ. Harald