The intent of item 8 was for the IETF to provide API-related requirements to the W3C, not for API-related work to be done in IETF. For example, during the discussions on this list there has been discussion of the need to obtain IP addresses of interfaces as required by ICE, or the details of codec support required by Jingle or SDP offer/answer. -----Original Message----- From: rtc-web-bounces@alvestrand.no [mailto:rtc-web-bounces@alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Philippe Le Hegaret Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 12:34 PM To: Ted Hardie Cc: François Daoust; rtc-web@alvestrand.no Subject: Re: [RTW] New proposed charter text. Please review before the BoF. On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 09:18 -0700, Ted Hardie wrote:
8. Provide W3C input for the APIs that comes from the communication model and the selected components and protocols that are part of the solution.
From a W3C point, I'd like to understand what item 8 means. W3C is putting in place a working group to develop the APIs.
Will the IETF Group also work on them in order to provide input? There is certainly a need for coordination between the two groups but I'm concerned that the IETF Group would work on the APIs... Regards, Philippe _______________________________________________ RTC-Web mailing list RTC-Web@alvestrand.no http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtc-web