+1 Oddly, when I first saw that name it reminded me of the old RTC Client API reference via Microsoft, but I am feeling much better now ;) -Erik On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>wrote:
It seems that most people have been comfortable with referring to this effort as RTCWEB. That's also the name we got our BOF approved under.
Our current charter draft at http://rtc-web.alvestrand.com/ietf-activityhas a kitchen-sink list of possible names; we could in theory hold a straw poll on the list, ask everyone to rank their preferred opinion, do a Condorcet-method ranking exercise on the result, and hope that we don't end up with a preference loop... but it might be simpler to just declare consensus and leave it as-is.
If Ted, Cullen and I don't hear a groundswell of opinion that we need to run a straw poll exercise, we'll just leave it as RTCWEB, and remove the alternatives.
Seems OK?
Harald
_______________________________________________ RTC-Web mailing list RTC-Web@alvestrand.no http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtc-web