On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 04:08 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: [snip]
The JavaScript Core Guide 1.5 notes "JavaScript will always include features that are not part of the ECMA specification; JavaScript is compatible with ECMA, while providing additional features." which is also true for JavaScript 1.5; The specification the draft references states which features are compatible with ECMA-262 and which aren't.
The "Core JavaScript Reference" isn't a language specification. It's my understanding that JavaScript has no such thing; it is defined in terms of a reference implementation, SpiderMonkey. Would it be inappropriate to list that as a normative reference? -- Braden McDaniel e-mail: <braden@endoframe.com> <http://endoframe.com> Jabber: <braden@jabber.org>