
5 Feb
2005
5 Feb
'05
9:06 p.m.
On Thu February 3 2005 20:56, Martin Duerst wrote:
Hello Yakov,
As far as I know, there is no convention that would force either text/comma-separated-values or text/cvs. My suggestion is to pick one, and have implementations converge on it. I'd personally prefer text/cvs, just because it's shorter.
On the other hand, "comma-separated-values" is meaningful, whereas neither the originally-proposed "csv" nor Martin's suggested "cvs" is; and that probably explains the transcription error.