On Friday, October 24, 2003, 2:59:58 AM, MURATA wrote: MM> On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:39:17 +0200 MM> Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:
If your applications are tested with multiple charsets, and you can demonstrate that your applications interoperably:
MM> Chris can certainly argue against RFC 3023 and try to improve it. Well, I could. Instead, though, I prefer to suggest wording that directly and normatively references RFC 3023 since that is the current specification. MM> However, I do not think that Linus would like to wait for the MM> conclusion of that debate. I don't recall suggesting anyone wait for anything. MM> Apparently, application/shf+xml and RFC 3023 should be in sync, For example, using my suggested wording whereby the registration for application/shf+xml references what RFC 3023 says to do. MM> By the way, if we drop the charset from RFC 3023, some SOAP MM> implementations will break. Perhaps you could indicate where I suggested altering the SOAP specification? MM> Linus wrote:
If, on the other hand, (...) then I urge you to *not* add a charset parameter but instead, to add the sentence:
Your previous statements on this issue have not gone unnoticed, so that's how I do it. Thanks, Chris.
MM> I do not think that this is a good action. However, you fail to articulate a reason for this. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org