Martin, Here's the template (I changed the POC from Cullen to me): To: ietf-types@iana.org Subject: Registration of media type application/pkcs8 Type name: application Subtype name: pkcs8 Required parameters: None Optional parameters: None Encoding considerations: binary Security considerations: Carries a cryptographic private key Interoperability considerations: The PKCS#8 object inside this MIME type MUST be DER-encoded PrivateKeyInfo. Published specification: --THIS SPECIFICATION-- /** RFC EDITOR: Replace "--THIS SPECIFICATION--" with the RFC # assigned to this document. **/ Applications which use this media type: Any MIME-compliant transport Additional information: Magic number(s): None File extension(s): .p8 Macintosh File Type Code(s): Person & email address to contact for further information: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> Restrictions on usage: none Author: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> Intended usage: COMMON Change controller: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> spt Martin J. Dürst wrote:
If the registration template is exactly the same, I don't think a new review is needed, but I might be wrong. Anyway, please send templates, not only pointers, to this list. Thanks.
Regards, Martin.
On 2010/04/10 2:02, Sean Turner wrote:
I believe that the application/pkcs8 media type registration was reviewed by these experts previously; however, the last time it was reviewed it was in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sip-certs. The registration was moved from the sip-certs ID to an ID that updates PKCS#8 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat-04) to keep all the PKCS#8 information in one place. Can someone confirm whether or not a new review is needed? If it is, can the clock start now?
spt