* Mark Baker wrote:
Where is the specification for MusicXML? The template references a DTD in the specification section, but it seems to be just a DTD, not a spec. I can't find any other spec for it on the site either.
Of course a published specification is not necessary for vendor tree registrations, and the proposed registration documents say it is "to be published".
The XML format will need its own file extension. Reusing ".xml" is unsuitable because it is commonly bound to the application/xml, text/xml, or text/rss media types. Consult http://filext.com to find a suitable one.
There are many formats that re-use application/xml and there are many +xml formats that cite or otherwise use .xml as appropriate extension. There is no actual need for a separate file extension. If .xml is what applications and documents use now, that's what should be registered. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/