
8 Feb
2005
8 Feb
'05
3:03 a.m.
At 06:06 05/02/06, Bruce Lilly wrote:
On the other hand, "comma-separated-values" is meaningful, whereas neither the originally-proposed "csv" nor Martin's suggested "cvs" is; and that probably explains the transcription error.
Appologies for my typo. I think "csv" is known well enough for people who use it frequently enough. It's also the customary extension. So I don't see any problems to go with "csv". Regards, Martin.