On Friday, October 24, 2003, 11:44:30 AM, MURATA wrote: MM> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 03:22:46 +0200 MM> Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:
For example, using my suggested wording whereby the registration for application/shf+xml references what RFC 3023 says to do.
MM> I do not think so, because the proposed I-D does not say MM> Same as [charset parameter/ encoding considerations] of MM> application/xml as specified in RFC 3023 MM> which is what RFC 3023 says to do. My suggested wording, which was only suggested a few days ago on this list so might not be in the latest ID was "There is no charset parameter. Character handling has identical semantics to the case where the charset parameter of the "application/xml" media type is omitted, as described in [RFC3023]." The intent seems identical to what you suggest. What am I missing here? -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org