If the registration template is exactly the same, I don't think a new review is needed, but I might be wrong. Anyway, please send templates, not only pointers, to this list. Thanks. Regards, Martin. On 2010/04/10 2:02, Sean Turner wrote:
I believe that the application/pkcs8 media type registration was reviewed by these experts previously; however, the last time it was reviewed it was in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sip-certs. The registration was moved from the sip-certs ID to an ID that updates PKCS#8 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat-04) to keep all the PKCS#8 information in one place. Can someone confirm whether or not a new review is needed? If it is, can the clock start now?
spt
-- #-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp