* Paul Libbrecht
Why not be more precise such as "any tool that can process or produce topics and relationships among them about any possible entity; this has included, in the past, ... and your list...".
Hmmmm. Well. Unfortunately, this isn't entirely true, as it takes a bit more than that to support Topic Maps. But I could turn it around and make it something like this: Applications which use this media type: Any tool which can process or produce data according to the Topic Maps Data Model. This has included in the past generic Topic Maps tools, web portals, product configuration tools, e-learning systems, and a variety of web services and web service clients. Would this work?
I would agree you have no reason to be more precise than RDF but indeed, their statement is bloated.
It's pretty vague, yes.
Maybe it would be possible from this paragraph to deduce that you have similar ambitions to RDF?
I hope it would, but it's kind of hard for me as an insider to judge. --Lars M. http://www.garshol.priv.no/tmphoto/ http://www.garshol.priv.no/blog/