James Cloos wrote:
"Eric" == Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> writes:
Eric> Encoding considerations: Eric> The syntax of Turtle is expressed over code points in Eric> Unicode[UNICODE]. The encoding is always UTF-8 [RFC3629]; the Eric> charset parameter is not needed; though it may be included so Eric> long as the value is 'UTF-8'.
Shouldn't the normative reference be to the UCS (ISO 10646) rather than to Unicode? The Universal Character Set is the international standard.
I'm sure Eric knows the explanation below on how to reference Unicode and / or ISO 10464 ... http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-charmod-20050215/#sec-RefUnicode see esp. http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-charmod-20050215/#C062 "Since specifications in general need both a definition for their characters and the semantics associated with these characters, specifications SHOULD include a reference to the Unicode Standard, whether or not they include a reference to ISO/IEC 10646." I think this is applicable also for this case. Felix